Rules of reviewing and publishing

Materials that are reviews and reviews of scientific publications, announcements and reviews of scientific events, information reports are not subject to review and are published by decision of the editorial board or in other cases provided for in the Law of the Russian Federation No. 2124-1 "On Mass Media" dated 27.12.1991.

In case the author is a graduate student, associate or attached to an associate (graduate school) to prepare a dissertation study for the degree of Candidate of Sciences, the author submits to the editorial office the scanned review of his scientific leader on materials sent for publication. Having a review by a scientific supervisor is a necessary but not sufficient condition for publishing the article. Articles of postgraduate students, adjuncts and applicants are also reviewed according to the requirements established by the editorial board.

The responsible secretary of the editorial board, after receiving the materials issued in accordance with the established rules, sends them for review.
The review of materials for publication in the journal is done by double-blind review, the identities of reviewers and authors are hidden from each other throughout the review.
In order to ensure "blind" review, the responsible secretary of the editorial board sends the received materials for publication to reviewers without indicating the identity of the author. If necessary, the responsible secretary of the editorial board, in coordination with the editor-in-chief, may require the author to prepare the materials in such a way that they do not reveal the author 's identity to the reviewers, directly or indirectly.

Reviewers are typically members of the editorial board. In some cases, by the decision of the editor-in-chief, the reviewers may be other specialists. The reviewer may be at least one specialist with a degree in a scientific specialty corresponding to the branch of science presented in the article. In some cases, when publishing materials directly related to the practical aspects of the question under study, the reviewer may be a specialist without a degree (academic rank) who has experience in high-level leadership positions in the field studied in the peer-reviewed article. The reviewer prepares the review according to an approximate form where he estimates the scientific level of the submitted article and makes the decision on the publication of article or on its deviation.
If the materials are rejected, the review is sent to the author by e-mail.


Дата последнего обновления: 03.02.2020 10:33

архив новостей

« Февраль
Пн Вт Ср Чт Пт Сб Вс
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 1
2020 2019 2018  
ИНТЕРНЕТ-ПРИЕМНАЯ Напишите нам электронное письмо

Телефон доверия

МЕРОПРИЯТИЯ ИНСТИТУТА

24 марта 2020 года состоится научно-практическая конференция «Проблемы реализации уголовных наказаний и иных мер уголовно-правового характера: взгляд молодого поколения»

19–20 марта 2020 г.состоится научно-практическая конференция «Вклад уголовно-исполнительной системы в развитие Кузбасса», посвященная 300-летию образования Кузбасса

Внимание! ФКОУ ВО Кузбасский институт ФСИН России выступает соорганизатором конференции «Развитие уголовно-исполнительной системы: организационные, правовые и экономические аспекты», проведение которой запланировано в рамках второго Международного юридического форума «Право и экономика: национальный опыт и стратегии развития» 20-22 мая 2020года (г. Новосибирск).

О проведении XV Всероссийского конкурса молодежи образовательных и научных организаций на лучшую работу «Моя законотворческая инициатива»